Chromium grants the REST API: its pool becomes H2's foreign source¶
# research(2026-10). Chromium's infra-dev list answered the narrowed request of 2026-10-15, about
2,000 merged changes with their inline review comments created 2024-11 to 2025-08 from one client
at no more than one request a second, on 2026-10-15 (18:28 PDT), from a Chrome Infra address: "There
are no concerns with hitting Gerrit's REST API at such a rate." The thread is titled for
chromium-review and android-review, and AJ reads the answer as covering both. The request named
NoteDb over git; the answer names the REST API, which is the route used here. That scope is a
foreign pool, not Chromium as an evaluated organization, whose full corpus stays blocked as on
2026-10-14 (chromium/src's 18,509 merged changes a month against the host's 10,000-result cap).
By item 1 of the H2 plan (2026-10-14), H2's foreign source is the first of Chromium, Fuchsia and AOSP
whose maintainers grant written permission before the first H2 development contrast, so it is
Chromium, provided its pool covers every matched draw (item 3); decomposition.FOREIGN_SOURCE is
set by the commit that checks that coverage, not here. AOSP's held data stays out of every figure,
since the source is Chromium's.
The pool, fixed before any of its yield is read:
- Host and route. chromium-review.googlesource.com over REST (
cli.REST_PERMITTED, 1 s between requests, one client, five minutes quiet after a 5xx), intodatasets/gerrit-granted, beside Qt's. The grant's scope is in code (cli.GrantScope): the transport answers only listings that name v8/v8 and nothing wider,fetchrefuses other projects, other months and an earlier cutoff,buildrefuses REST reads without a cap of 170 or less and any month outside the grant, andresume_when_allowed.shrefuses the host, since it builds uncapped. The git route stays refused (notedb.GIT_PERMITTED):fetch_chromium.shfetches whole projects through 2025-10. - Project. v8/v8 alone: of the five C++ projects that cleared the 2026-09-22 selection rule, the one with the largest projected C++ yield after chromium/src (2,387 examples over the ten training months if every human change were read, C++ 0.791 of files), reviewed on chromium-review. chromium/src is outside the grant's scale and the cap above.
- Months. 2024-11 to 2025-08, cutoff 2024-11-01, each fetched whole (its query pages list changes with their comment counts).
- Reads.
build --fewer-requests --read-cap 170: each month reads at most 170 commented changes, drawn in the order ofsha256("20261016:<number>")(cli.READ_CAP_SEED); the rest are counted asover_read_cap, a row of the dataset funnel. Not the lowest numbers: a month lists the changes last updated in it, so its lowest numbers are the oldest, longest-open ones; on Qt's granted snapshots, the 170 lowest commented numbers of each month from 2024-12 to 2025-10 had median days open of 15 to 66 against 0.4 to 1.9 for all commented changes (independent review). V8's listing carriestotal_comment_count(one in-scope request, 2026-10-16), so the comment-count probe can run: with its 300 zero-count rows and 30 controls (comment_count_probe.py, required by--fewer-requests), the study reads at most 2,030 changes, the grant's "about 2,000"; a control the cap also draws is read once, so the count can be lower. The cap holds per month and per build mode: a rebuild in the other mode draws from another candidate set, so the pool is built once, with--fewer-requests. - Then. refine, dedup, split as for any organization; the pool is deduplicated against Qt, and check 4 compares it with Qt's evaluated test window at 2% at Jaccard 0.7. If the pool cannot cover every matched draw, the source falls to Fuchsia, as item 1 says, and is not widened past the grant.